CourtListener 10148925•SCDSS v. Chantel J.
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Chantel Johnson McGreer, Ricky McGreer, and Jonathan
Sullivan, Sr., Defendants,
Of Whom Chantel Johnson McGreer and Ricky McGreer
are the Appellants,
In the interest of minor children under the age of
eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2014-000571
Appeal From Greenville County
David E. Phillips, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-118
Submitted February 11, 2015 – Filed March 2, 2015
AFFIRMED
Anne Bell Fant, of Law Office of Anne Bell Fant, LLC,
of Simpsonville, for Appellant Chantel McGreer.
Jeffrey Dean Ezell, of Ezell Law Firm, LLC, of
Greenville, for Appellant Ricky McGreer.
Jonathan Ashley Neal, of the South Carolina Department
of Social Services, of Greenville, for Respondent.
Robert A. Clark, of Greenville, for the Guardian ad
Litem.
PER CURIAM: Chantel McGreer and Ricky McGreer appeal the family court's
final order terminating their parental rights to their minor children. See S.C. Code
Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2014). Upon a thorough review of the record and the
family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte
Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that
warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve
Chantel's and Ricky's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
FEW, C.J., and HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.