State v. Bloodsaw

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Thomas L. Bloodsaw, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-000643

Appeal From Richland County
R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-002
Submitted November 1, 2014 – Filed January 7, 2015

APPEAL DISMISSED

Austin Howell Crosby, of Peters, Murdaugh, Parker,
Eltzroth & Detrick, P.A., of Hampton, Chief Appellate
Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, and
Thomas L. Bloodsaw, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1

HUFF, SHORT, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.