State v. Feagin

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

McIver Rembert Feagin, Jr., Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2012-213695

Appeal From Florence County
Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-460
Submitted November 1, 2014 – Filed December 17, 2014

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of
Columbia; and McIver Rembert Feagin, Jr., pro se, for
Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.