SCDSS v. Gibson

CourtListener 10148702Scctapp30 dic 2014

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Kendra Gibson and Timothy Gibson, Defendants,

Of whom Timothy Gibson is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2014-001136

Appeal From Greenville County
Rochelle Y. Conits, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-487
Submitted November 25, 2014 – Filed December 30, 2014

AFFIRMED

Samuel Carl Weldon, of Weldon Hammond Law Firm,
LLC, of Greenville; and Timothy Gibson, pro se, for
Appellant.

Rebecca Rush Wray, of the South Carolina Department
of Social Services, of Greenville, for Respondent.
Don J. Stevenson, of Don J. Stevenson, Attorney at Law,
of Greenville, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Timothy Gibson appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-
2570 (2010 & Supp. 2013). Upon a thorough review of Gibson's pro se brief, the
record, and the family court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to
Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious
issues that warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and
relieve Gibson's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.