In the Matter of Alphonso Haynesworth

CourtListener 10148605Scctapp24 set 2014

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Alphonso
Haynesworth, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-000486

Appeal From Sumter County
W. Jeffrey Young, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-341
Submitted August 1, 2014 – Filed September 24, 2014

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967).1 Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, SHORT, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1
See also In re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 427, 602 S.E.2d 58, 59 (2004) (adopting the
Anders procedure for alleged no-merit appeals in sexually violent predator
involuntary commitment appeals).
2
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.