Ransom v. State

CourtListener 10148590Scctapp6 ago 2014

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Tyrone Ransom, Petitioner,

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2011-193527

Appeal From Marion County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-314
Submitted June 1, 2014 – Filed August 6, 2014

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of
Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Deputy Attorney General David A. Spencer, both of
Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Petitioner's direct appeal is dismissed after review pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is
granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and SHORT and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.