CourtListener 10148555•SCDSS v. Kinslow
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Donica Kinslow and Damian Braxton, Defendants,
Of whom Donica Kinslow is the Appellant,
In the interest of a minor child under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2013-002546
Appeal From Horry County
Georgia V. Anderson, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-302
Submitted July 10, 2014 – Filed July 25, 2014
AFFIRMED
Heather Michelle Cannon, of Heather M. Cannon, LLC,
of Conway, for Appellant.
Ernest Joseph Jarrett, of Jenkinson Jarrett & Kellahan,
PA, of Kingstree, for Respondent.
Ian Andrew Taylor, of Taylor Law Office, of Pawleys
Island, for Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Donica Kinslow appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-
2570 (2010 & Supp. 2013). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant
briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.
AFFIRMED.1
HUFF, THOMAS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.