State v. Stokes

CourtListener 10148126Scctapp4 set 2013

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

John Stokes, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-190427

Appeal From Sumter County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-348
Submitted August 1, 2013 – Filed September 4, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Tommy Evans, Jr. and Matthew C. Buchanan, both of the
South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and
Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967).1 Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and PIEPER and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1
Appellant's assertion that the circuit court ordered Appellant "to pay money
owed in the form of a civil judgment" is not substantiated by the record on appeal.
Therefore, Appellant's request that this court remand this appeal for a hearing
regarding the amount of debt owed is denied.
2
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.