SCDSS v. Elizabeth W.

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Elizabeth W., Russell F., and Joe G., Defendants,

Of whom Elizabeth W. is the Appellant,

In the interest of a minor child under the age of 18 years.

Appellate Case No. 2012-212644

Appeal From Anderson County
Tommy B. Edwards, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-061
Submitted January 17, 2013 – Filed January 28, 2013

AFFIRMED

Floy Kenyon Anderson, of Kenyon Lusk & Anderson, of
Anderson, for Appellant.

Amy C. Sutherland, of Greenville, and Kathleen J.
Hodges, of Anderson, both of the South Carolina
Department of Social Services, for Respondent.
Brittany Dreher Tye, of Senerius & Tye, Attorneys at
Law, of Anderson, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Elizabeth W. appeals from the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-
2570 (2010 & Supp. 2012). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant
briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., and WILLIAMS and PIEPER, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.