SCDSS v. Kimberly E.

CourtListener 10147556Scctapp21 nov 2012

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Kimberly E., Kenneth A. W., Sr., and Joshua M.,
Defendants,

Of whom, Kimberly E. is the Appellant,

In the interest of two minor children under the age of 18.

Appellate Case No. 2011-198046

Appeal From Union County
W. Thomas Sprott, Jr., Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-631
Submitted November 1, 2012 – Filed November 21, 2012

AFFIRMED

William Cory Hughes, of Law Office of W. Cory
Hughes, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.

John Corbitt Hinson, III, of South Carolina Department
of Social Services, of Rock Hill; and Oshun Cyrus
Hinton, of Law Offices of O. Cyrus Hinton, PA, of Rock
Hill, for Respondent.

Vanessa Cason, of Greenville, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Kimberly E. appeals a family court order terminating her
parental rights to her minor children: See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010
& Supp. 2011). Upon a thorough review of the record pursuant to Ex Parte
Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues
warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.