State v. Teasley

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Travis Teasley, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-184486

Appeal From Pickens County
Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-493
Submitted August 1, 2012 – Filed August 22, 2012

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy
Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant
Attorney General Christina J. Catoe, all of Columbia; and
Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed1 pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authority: State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 693-94 (2003) ("In
order for an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to
and ruled upon by the trial judge. . . . A party may not argue one ground at trial
and an alternate ground on appeal.").

AFFIRMED.

HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.