Green v. SCDC

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

James Green, Appellant,

v.

South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2011-195646

Appeal From The Administrative Law Court
John D. McLeod, Administrative Law Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-415
Submitted July 2, 2012 – Filed July 11, 2012

AFFIRMED

James Green, pro se.

Christopher D. Florian, of the South Carolina Department
of Corrections, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed1 pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities:

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
1. As to whether the Administrative Law Court erred in dismissing Green's appeal:
Rule 51, SCRPALC ("[Administrative Law Court Rules 51-66] shall apply
exclusively in matters heard on appeal from final decisions pursuant to Al-Shabazz
v. State, 338 S.C. 354, 527 S.E.2d 742 (2000)."); Rule 60(A), SCRPALC
(requiring an appellant to file a brief); Rule 60(B)(1), SCRPALC (stating each
brief shall contain a statement of issues on appeal and "no point will be considered
that is not set forth in the statement of issues on appeal"); Rule 62, SCRPALC
("[A]n Administrative Law Judge may dismiss an appeal for failure to comply with
any of the rules of procedure for appeals . . . .").

2. As to the remaining issues: Risher v. S.C. Dep't Health & Envtl. Control,
393 S.C. 198, 210-11, 712 S.E.2d 428, 435 (2011) (noting an appellate court
need not review remaining issues when the determination of a prior issue is
dispositive of the appeal).

AFFIRMED.

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, concur.