State v. Bright

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD
NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Roy G. Bright, Appellant.
__________

Appeal From Spartanburg County
J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge
__________

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-426
Submitted June 1, 2012 – Filed July 18, 2012
__________

APPEAL DISMISSED
__________

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barry J. Barnette, of
Spartanburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Roy G. Bright appeals his conviction of assault and
battery of a high and aggravated nature, arguing the circuit court erred in
failing to hold an in camera hearing to determine if a photographic line-up
should be suppressed. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.