State v. Williams

CourtListener 10143040Scctapp9 ott 2007

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

James T.
Williams, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

D. Garrison Hill, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-428

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October
9, 2007   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant, James T. Williams, was indicted for and
convicted of the possession with intent to distribute heroin, possession with
intent to distribute heroin within one-half mile of a school, possession with
intent to distribute crack cocaine, possession with intent to distribute crack
cocaine within one-half mile of a school, and possession of cocaine.  The trial
judge sentenced Williams to fifteen years for PWID heroin, five years
concurrent for PWID heroin within one-half mile of a school, three years
consecutive for PWID crack cocaine, ten years concurrent for PWID crack cocaine
within one-half mile of a school, and five years concurrent for possession of
cocaine.  Williams’ counsel
attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that she
had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit.  Williams filed
a separate pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN,
C.J., HUFF, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.