State v. McKinney

CourtListener 10143020Scctapp11 ott 2007

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Monique L.
McKinney, Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County

 R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-466   

ubmitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October
11, 2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
of Columbia, Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant, Monique McKinney, pled guilty
to armed robbery, kidnapping, possession of a firearm during commission of a
violent crime, possession of a firearm by a person under 21, credit card theft,
and credit card fraud.  The trial judge sentenced her to ten years on both the
robbery and kidnapping charges, five years on each of the firearm charges, and
one year on each of the credit card charges with the sentences concurrent.  McKinney’s counsel attached to the brief
a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that he had reviewed the record
and concluded this appeal lacks merit.  McKinney filed
a separate pro se brief.  After
a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN,
CJ., HUFF, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.