State v. Curry

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Shaun Curry, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

 Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2007-UP-484

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October
12, 2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, South Carolina Commission of
Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

John Benjamin Aplin, South Carolina Department of Probation Parole
& Pardon, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Shaun
Curry appeals the revocation of his probation.  Curry had been previously
sentenced for shoplifting and received a sentence of three years, suspended on
two years probation.  Curry’s probation violations were failure to report to
his probation agent and failure to pay fees and fines.  Curry argues the court
should have considered Curry’s failure to report to his probation agent was due
to circumstances beyond his control.  Curry did not file a pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1969), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to
be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.        

HEARN, C.J., HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCRACR.