State v. Patterson

CourtListener 10138438Scctapp13 lug 2005

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The
State,        Respondent,

v.

Richard Allen
Patterson,        Appellant.

Appeal From Laurens County

John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.
2005-UP-430

Submitted July 1, 2005 – Filed July 13, 2005

APPEAL DISMISSED

Acting Chief Attorney Joseph
L. Savitz III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry
Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Richard
Allen Patterson appeals his conviction and sentence of twenty years imprisonment
for first-degree burglary.  He asserts the trial judge erred by informing
him of his right to appeal his conviction and sentence.  Patterson
maintains his guilty plea was conditional, and thus invalid.  After a
thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1]
Patterson’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J. and BEATTY and SHORT,
JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.