State v. Hughes

CourtListener 10138428Scctapp14 lug 2005

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The
State,        Respondent,

v.

Tracy
Hughes,        Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

John W. Kittredge, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.
2005-UP-446

Submitted July 1, 2005 – Filed July 14, 2005

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender
Tara S. Taggart, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry
Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh,
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the
Attorney General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III,
of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Tracy
Hughes appeals his conviction for felony driving under the influence resulting
in great bodily injury.  Hughes filed a pro se brief.  After a
thorough review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Hughes’ pro se
brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Hughes’ appeal and grant counsel’s
motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, STILWELL, and WILLIAMS,
JJ., concur.

[1] We dismiss this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.