State v. Steed

CourtListener 10137976Scctapp6 dic 2004

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Robert Antonio Steed, Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County

 Luke N. Brown, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-608

Submitted December 1, 2004 – Filed December 6, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Stephan Victor Futeral, of Mt. Pleasant, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General
John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Robert Antonio Steed was found guilty of
criminal conspiracy; first-degree burglary; armed robbery; assault and battery
with intent to kill (ABIK); and murder.  He was sentenced to five years for
conspiracy; thirty years for first-degree burglary; thirty years for armed robbery;
twenty years for ABIK; and thirty years for murder.

Steed’s appellate counsel filed a brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).  Counsel additionally
submitted a petition to be relieved from representation, asserting there are
no directly appealable issues of arguable merit.  Steed filed a pro se
response with the Court.

After a review of the record pursuant to
Anders and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.
[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, STILWELL and SHORT, JJ., concur.

[1] We
decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.