State v. Watts

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,                                        Respondent,

v.

Darlene Theresa Watts,                   Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

J. Ernest Kinard, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-503

Submitted October 1, 2004 – Filed October
8, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda P. Hagler,
of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Darlene Theresa Watts pled guilty to four counts
of forgery and three counts of bank fraud.  She was sentenced to four years
on each offense, to be served concurrently.  Watts’s appellate counsel filed
a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).  Counsel
additionally submitted a petition to be relieved from representation, asserting
there are no directly appealable issues of arguable merit.  Watts filed a pro
se response with the Court.

After a review of the record pursuant to Anders and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal
and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.
[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, ANDERSON, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1]
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.