State v. Lowden

CourtListener 10137806Scctapp16 set 2004

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT

BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING 

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Cedric Fitzgerald Lowden, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

 Henry F. Floyd, Circuit Court Judge

Opinion No.    2004- UP-481

Submitted September 14, 2004 – Filed
September 16, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, Office of Appellate
Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry D. McMaster,  Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia, and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Cedric Lowden (Appellant) was
convicted of burglary in the second degree.  He was sentenced to imprisonment
for a period of fifteen years.

On appeal, counsel for Appellant has filed
a final brief along with a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Appellant filed
a pro se response.  After a thorough review of the record pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s
petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]

GOOSLBY, ANDERSON, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1]   This case is decided without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.