State v. Darnell

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD 

NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY 

PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Robert Lynn Darnell, Appellant.

Appeal From Pickens County

 John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-452

Submitted July 7, 2004 – Filed August 25, 2004 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender
Tara S. Taggart, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia,  for Appellant,

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Robert Lynn Darnell appeals
his conviction of first-degree burglary.  Darnell argues there was insufficient
evidence of guilt of first-degree burglary.  Darnell’s counsel attached to the
brief a petition to be relieved, stating she had reviewed the record and concluded
the appeal lacks merit.  Darnell did not file a pro se brief.  After
a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss
[1] Darnell’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., HUFF and KITTREDGE,
JJ., concur.            
                 

[1] We decide this case without oral arguments pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.