CourtListener 10137715•State v. Johnson
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT
BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Charles F. Johnson,
Appellant.
Appeal From Georgetown County
James E. Lockemy, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-384
Submitted April 21, 2004 Filed June
18, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia,
for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor J. Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Charles F. Johnson
was convicted of second-degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor, lewd act
on a minor, and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. The circuit court
sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment for second-degree criminal sexual
conduct with a minor, eight years imprisonment for lewd act on a minor, and
three years imprisonment for contributing to the delinquency of a minor, the
sentences to run concurrently. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), Johnsons counsel attached a petition to be relieved. Johnson
did not file a pro se response.
After review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Johnsons appeal and grant counsels
petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
[1]
GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and BEATTY, JJ., concurring.
[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue
on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215
and 220(b)(2), SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.