State v. Harley

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Anthony Harley, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington
County

Marc H. Westbrook, Circuit
Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion
No. 2004-UP-302

Submitted February 20, 2004
Filed May 6, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Assistant Appellate
Defender Wanda P. Hagler, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia,
of Ridgeland, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan
McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant
Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor
Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:Anthony Harley
appeals his conviction and sentence for injuring a railroad.Harleys appellate
counsel has petitioned to be relieved as counsel, stating she has reviewed the
record and has concluded Harleys appeal is without merit.The issue briefed
by counsel concerns whether the trial court erred accepted Harleys guilty plea
without advising him of the sentencing consequences.Harley has not filed any
materials on his own behalf.

After
a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits.
Accordingly, we dismiss Harleys appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE,
JJ., concur.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving the issues
on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rules 215
and 220(b)(2), SCACR.