State v. Littlejohn

CourtListener 10137658Scctapp6 mag 2004

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PREDCEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tron Littlejohn, Appellant.

Appeal From Cherokee
County

J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion
No. 2004-UP-304

Submitted February 20, 2004
– Filed May 6, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Assistant Appellate
Defender Wanda P. Hagler, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan
McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant
Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, all of Columbia; and
Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Tron
Littlejohn was convicted of distribution of crack cocaine and distribution of
crack cocaine within the proximity of a school.  The circuit court sentenced
him to fifteen years imprisonment on each of the charges, the sentences to run
concurrently.  Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
Littlejohn’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved.  Littlejohn filed a
pro se response.

After review of the record pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Littlejohn’s appeal and grant
counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
[1]

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE,
JJ., concurring.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue
on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215
and 220(b)(2), SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.