State v. Eubanks

CourtListener 10137600Scctapp15 apr 2004

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. 
IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS
PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Larry Allen Eubanks,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-250

Submitted February 20, 2004 – Filed
April 15, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda P. Hagler, South
Carolina Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Larry Allen Eubanks (Appellant)
was convicted of first-degree burglary and petit larceny.  He was sentenced
to eighteen years in prison for first-degree burglary and thirty days for petit
larceny.   

On appeal, counsel for Appellant has filed a final
brief along with a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Appellant has not filed
a pro se response.  After a thorough review of the record pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s
petition to be relieved.              

APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]

GOOSLBY and HOWARD, JJ., and CURETON, Acting J., concur.

[1]   This case is decided without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.