CourtListener 10137526•State v. Williams
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Billy Ray Williams,
Appellant.
Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-176
Submitted January 29, 2004 Filed March
16, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia;
for Appellant.
Teresa A. Knox, Tommy Evans, Jr., J. Benjamin Aplin, all of
Columbia; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Billy Ray Williams
pled guilty to leaving the scene of an accident with personal injury. The circuit
court sentenced him to four years imprisonment and payment of a $4,000 fine,
suspended on service of two years probation and payment of a $1,000 fine. Subsequently,
Williams was arrested for noncompliance with the terms of his probation, and
the circuit court revoked his probation, imposing the remainder of his suspended
sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Williams
counsel attached a petition to be relieved. Williams did not file a pro se
response.
After review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Williams appeal and grant counsels
petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
[1]
GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concurring.
[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue
on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215
and 220(b)(2), SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.