CourtListener 10137392•State v. Cater
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED
ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Grover Steven Cater,
Appellant.
Appeal From Anderson County
Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-139
Submitted December 23, 2003 Filed
February 27, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia,
for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Druanne D. White, of Anderson, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Grover Steven Cater
was indicted for criminal sexual conduct with a minor in the first degree.
He was convicted of the lesser-included offense of assault and battery of a
high and aggravated nature. Cater was sentenced to tens years imprisonment,
suspended upon the service of seven years imprisonment and five years probation.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Caters counsel
attached a petition to be relieved as counsel. Cater did not file a pro se
response.
After review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Caters appeal and grant counsels petition
to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
[1]
GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE,
JJ., concurring.
[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue
on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215
and 220(b)(2), SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.