State v. Cater

CourtListener 10137392Scctapp27 feb 2004

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED
ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Grover Steven Cater,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Anderson County

Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-139

Submitted December 23, 2003 – Filed
February 27, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Druanne D. White, of Anderson, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Grover Steven Cater
was indicted for criminal sexual conduct with a minor in the first degree. 
He was convicted of the lesser-included offense of assault and battery of a
high and aggravated nature.  Cater was sentenced to tens years imprisonment,
suspended upon the service of seven years imprisonment and five years probation. 
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Cater’s counsel
attached a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Cater did not file a pro se
response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Cater’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition
to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
[1]

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE,
JJ., concurring.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue
on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215
and 220(b)(2), SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.