State v. Collao

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Francisco A. Collao, Jr.,       
Appellant.

Appeal From York County

Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-713

Submitted September 17, 2003 – Filed
December 9, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, Office of Appellate Defense,
of Columbia, for Appellant. 

Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel
Tommy Evans, Jr. and J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Francisco A. Collao, Jr. appeals
the revocation of his probation.  Counsel for Collao attached to the final brief
a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Collao did not file a separate pro se
response. 

After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Collao’s
appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, STILWELL, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.