State v. Barber

CourtListener 10137053Scctapp24 giu 2003

Testo completo

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Theodore Barber,       
Appellant.

Appeal From York County

John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-422

Submitted April 18, 2003 – Filed
June 24, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary,
of Columbia, for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A.
Knox, Legal Counsel Tommy Evans and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin,   all of
Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Theodore Barber appeals from
an order of the trial court revoking his suspended sentence.  The court found
a willful violation of his suspended sentence and revoked his sentence in full. 
Barber’s appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).  Counsel additionally submitted a petition to be relieved
from representation, asserting there are no directly appealable issues of arguable
merit.  Barber did not file a pro se response with the Court.

After a review of the record pursuant to Anders
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss
the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.
[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CURETON, ANDERSON, and HUFF, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.