State v. Tuck

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

 

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

David Ray Tuck,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Oconee County

Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion
No. 2003-UP-328

Submitted March 26, 2003 – Filed
May 15, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Druanne D. White, of Anderson, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  David Ray Tuck pled guilty to criminal domestic violence
of a high and aggravated nature.  He was sentenced to three years, suspended
upon the service of 150 days, plus nine months probation.  Tuck’s appellate
counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967).  Counsel additionally submitted a petition to be relieved from representation,
asserting there are no directly appealable issues of arguable merit.  Tuck did
not file a pro se response with the Court.

After a review of the record pursuant to Anders and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal
and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.
[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CURETON, ANDERSON, and HUFF, JJ., concur.

[1]
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.