State v. Pearson

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Corey Pearson       
Appellant.

Appeal From Lee County

Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-296

Submitted February 20, 2003 - Filed
April 30, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia;
for Appellant

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
of Columbia; Solicitor Cecil Kelley Jackson, of Sumter; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Corey Pearson appeals from his
guilty plea to two counts of second-degree burglary and two counts of grand
larceny, arguing his sentence was based on “invalid considerations.”  After
a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Pearson’s appeal and grant counsel’s
motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.