CourtListener 10136870•State v. Burris
Testo completo
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Ronald Lynn Burris # 3,
Appellant.
Appeal From Charleston County
Daniel F. Pieper, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-099
Submitted November 20, 2002 Filed
February 4, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda H. Haile, of Columbia;
for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster; Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh; Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
of Columbia; and Solicitor Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Ronald Lynn Burris appeals
his convictions and sentences for two counts of failing to stop for a blue light
and one count each for grand larceny, resisting arrest, resisting arrest with
assault, and resisting arrest with a deadly weapon. Counsel for Burris attached
to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel. Burris did not file
a separate pro se response.
After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss Burris appeal
and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
CONNOR, STILWELL, and HOWARD, JJ.,
concur.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.