CourtListener 10136866•State v. Dixon
Testo completo
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Teasha Levie Dixon,
Appellant.
Appeal From Marion County
James E. Brogdon, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-093
Submitted November 20, 2002 Filed
February 4, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda H. Haile, of Columbia;
for Appellant
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar Lewis Clements, III, of Florence; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Teasha Levie Dixon appeals
her convictions and sentence for distribution of crack cocaine and distribution
of crack cocaine within proximity of a school. Counsel for Dixon attached to
the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel. Dixon did not file a
separate pro se response.
After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss Dixons appeal
and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
CONNOR, STILWELL, and HOWARD, JJ.,
concur.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.