SCDSS v. Jake Wethington
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Amanda Lynn Delk and Jake Wethington, Defendants, of whom Jake Wethington is the Appellant. In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen. Appellate Case No. 2026-000243 Appeal From Lexington County Huntley S. Crouch, Family Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-454 Submitted October 8, 2026 – Filed October 15, 2026 AFFIRMED Lyn Howell Hensel, of Law Office of Lyn Howell Hensel, of Columbia, for Appellant. Jordan Alexander McWilliams, of the South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Lexington, for Respondent.
Machelle Yvonne Thompson, of Thompson & Sete'fano, LLC, of Columbia, for the Guardian ad Litem. PER CURIAM: Jake Wethington appeals the family court's final order terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2025). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Wethington's counsel. AFFIRMED.1 GEATHERS, HEWITT, and VINSON, JJ., concur. 1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.