367 Or 824 ; 367 Or 825 ; 367 Or 826 ; 367 Or 827•Petitions for review, April 8, 2021
Testo completo
824 PETITIONS FOR REVIEW (484 P3d 313-314) ALLOWED April 8, 2021 Gates v. Felton (A171633)(S067134)(on order of dismissal); rev dismissed, June 3, 2021 (368 Or 206) State v. Bernal, Antone Dean (A164359)(S066965)(297 Or App 811). Defendant’s petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate disposition of Counts 7 and 9 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. The court accepts the state’s concession that defendant’s convictions on Counts 7 and 9 in Lincoln County case no. 15CR49018 must be reversed. The court therefore reverses defendant’s convictions on Counts 7 and 9 in case no. 15CR49018. This disposition does not affect the jury’s guilty verdicts on 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 11, 12, and 13. Decision of Court of Appeals reversed in part; judgment of circuit court reversed in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings. State v. Blue, Kenneth William (A167344)(S067089)(299 Or App 521). Defendant’s petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate disposition of Count 1 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For reasons given in State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court accepts the state’s concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his conviction on Count 1 in Deschutes County case no. 15CR57070 qualifies for plain error review and exercises its discretion to correct the error. The court therefore reverses defendant’s conviction on Count 1 in case no. 15CR57070. Decision of Court of Appeals reversed in part, judgment of circuit court reversed in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings. State v. Chavez-Reyes, Francisco Javier (A168101)(S067751)(303 Or App 161). Defendant’s petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate disposition of Counts 1 and 4 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. The court accepts the state’s concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his convictions on Counts 1 and 4 in Washington County case no. 17CR75366 must be reversed. The court therefore reverses defendant’s convictions on Counts 1 and 4 in case no. 17CR75366. Decision of Court of Appeals reversed in part, judgment of circuit court reversed in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings. State v. Davidson, Dennis James (A165303)(S068231)(307 Or App 478) State v. Harry, Kester Gordon (A167756)(S067665)(302 Or App 361). Defendant’s petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate disposition of Count 2 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For reasons given in State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court accepts the state’s concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his conviction on Count 2 in Polk County case no. 17CR07025 qualifies for plain error review and exercises its discretion to correct the error. The court therefore reverses defendant’s conviction on Count 2 in case no. 17CR07025. Decision of Court of Appeals reversed in part, judgment of circuit court reversed in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings.
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW — Continued 825 (484 P3d 317-320) State v. Jackson, Thomas Thomas, Jr. (A166925)(S067255)(299 Or App 518). Defendant’s petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate disposition of Counts 1 and 5 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For reasons given in State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court accepts the state’s concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his convictions on Counts 1 and 5 in Washington County case no. 17CR42780 qualifies for plain error review and exercises its discretion to correct the error. The court therefore reverses defendant’s convictions on Counts 1 and 5 in case no. 17CR42780. Decision of Court of Appeals reversed in part, judgment of circuit court reversed in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings. State v. Johnson, Sean Michael (A165056)(S067082)(298 Or App 554). Defendant’s petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate disposition of Counts 1 and 2 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For reasons given in State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court accepts the state’s concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his convictions on Counts 1 and 2 in Marion County case no. 14C44115 qualifies for plain error review and exercises its discretion to correct the error. The court therefore reverses defendant’s convictions on Counts 1 and 2 in case no. 14C44115. Decision of Court of Appeals reversed in part; judgment of circuit court reversed in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings. Nakamoto, J., would allow review of the fourth and fifth questions presented. State v. Lackey, Jason Abraham (A164981)(S066809)(297 Or App 191). Defendant’s petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate disposition of Count 1 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. The court accepts the state’s concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his conviction on Count 1 in Lane County case no. 17CR14500 just be reversed. The court therefore reverses defendant’s conviction on Count 1 in case no. 17CR14500. Decision of Court of Appeals reversed in part, judgment of circuit court reversed in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings. State v. Manzanares-Hernandez, Rigoberto (A166020/21)(S066990)(298 Or App 841). Defendant’s petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate disposition of Count 1 in case no. 16CR74436 and Counts 2 and 3 in case no. 17CR0770 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For reasons given in State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court accepts the state’s concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his conviction on Count 1 in Marion County case no. 16CR74436 and Counts 2 and 3 in Marion County case no. 17CR0770 qualifies for plain error review and exercises its discretion to correct the error. The court therefore reverses defendant’s conviction on Count 1 in case no. 16CR74436 and Counts 2 and 3 in case no. 17CR0770. Decision of Court of Appeals reversed in part; judgment of circuit court reversed in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings. State v. Perez-Garcia, Jose Tranquilino (A162994)(S066550)(295 Or App 156). Defendant’s petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate
826 PETITIONS FOR REVIEW — Continued (484 P3d 314-321) disposition of Count 1 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For reasons given in State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court accepts the state’s concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his conviction on Count 1 in Marion County case no. 16CR15033 qualifies for plain error review and exercises its discretion to correct the error. The court therefore reverses defendant’s conviction on Count 1 in case no. 16CR15033. Decision of Court of Appeals reversed in part, judgment of circuit court reversed in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings. State v. Reyes-Herrera, Saul (A170594)(S068223)(307 Or App 500) State v. Swearingen, James Richard (A165274)(S066877)(298 Or App 56). Defendant’s petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate disposition of Count 1 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For reasons given in State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court accepts the state’s concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his conviction on Count 1 in Multnomah County case no. 16CR22360 qualifies for plain error review and exercises its discretion to correct the error. The court therefore reverses defendant’s conviction on Count 1 in case no. 16CR22360. Decision of Court of Appeals reversed in part, judgment of circuit court reversed in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings. DENIED April 8, 2021 Buchalski, Adam V. v. Bowser (A171103)(S068253)(307 Or App 272) Cardenas, Mario Ernesto Jaimes v. State of Oregon (A173653)(S068277)(308 Or App 463) Dalebout, Leroy Neil v. State of Oregon (A170774)(S068291)(307 Or App 659) Davenport, James Dimitri v. Peters (A170312)(S068254)(307 Or App 500) Department of Human Services v. B. S. (A173986)(S068325)(308 Or App 463) Dorn, Daniel Austin v. Bowser (A171054)(S068269)(307 Or App 500) Felipe-Sarmiento, Cristobal v. Washburn (A170548)(S068199)(307 Or App 272) Goodwin, William v. Causey (A171269)(S068299)(307 Or App 849) H. K. v. Spine Surgery Center of Eugene, LLC (A164453)(S068119)(305 Or App 606) Jensen v. Driver and Motor Vehicle Services Division (DMV), a division of the Department of Transportation (A169935)(S068274)(308 Or App 37) Lincoln Loan Co. v. The Estate of George W. Geppert (A168925)(S068168)(307 Or App 213) Lyon, Adam Steven v. Psychiatric Security Review Board (A170297)(S068249)(308 Or App 176) Martinez, Nicolas v. Cain (A170319)(S068278)(308 Or App 463) McClanahan, Terry D. v. Washburn (A171268)(S068290)(308 Or App 463) Medina v. State of Oregon, acting by and through the Department of Fish and Wildlife (A170744)(S068329)(308 Or App 660) Powell, Anthony Lashon v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A169475) (S068267)(307 Or App 659) Rice v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (A171563)(S068152) (307 Or App 238) Roberts, Sandra Kay v. State of Oregon (A170309)(S068289)(307 Or App 659)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW — Continued 827 (484 P3d 321-326) Sherrod, Vanessa v. Myers (A170840)(S068303)(307 Or App 849) State v. Bjornsen, Sigfrit Leslie (A170953/54)(S068232)(308 Or App 175) State v. Cooley, Patrick Thomas (A171175)(S068233)(308 Or App 175) State v. Eisenbeisz, Richard Wayne (A170277)(S068271)(308 Or App 169) State v. Garrett, Michael (A170192)(S068308)(308 Or App 175) State v. Godines, Maria Ellena (A170372)(S068218)(307 Or App 500) State v. Gonzalez, Jorge Luis Jacobo (A170181)(A170204)(A170180)(S068256)(308 Or App 176) State v. Haralamos, Adam King (A171057)(S068314)(307 Or App 850) State v. Jones, Darin Patrick (A170206)(S068177)(307 Or App 272) State v. Kelley, Michael Harvey (A169574)(S068344)(307 Or App 608) State v. Mekuriya, Bewuqetu Abebe (A166416)(S068322)(308 Or App 176) State v. Moore, Devante Xavier (A168802)(S068310)(307 Or App 649) State v. Rivera, Jose Mercedes (A170713)(S068281)(308 Or App 463) State v. Roberts, Jodi Michelle (A170270)(S068276)(308 Or App 225) State v. Rudd, Brian Curtis (A170133)(S068339)(307 Or App 610) State v. Shelby, Elric Vincent (A169269/70)(S068324)(307 Or App 500) State v. Shoop, Sierra Marie (A169741)(S068201)(306 Or App 551) State v. Speegle, Jami Lorraine (A170809)(S068210)(307 Or App 850) State v. Weathers, Michael James Robert (A172053)(S068219)(307 Or App 850) Villanueva, Gustavo v. Cain (A169953)(S068198)(307 Or App 413)(petition and supplemental petition) Walton, Tyrone Earl v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A170047) (S068204)(307 Or App 659) West-Howell, Anthony Allen v. Bowser (A170171)(S068309)(308 Or App 463)
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.