224-23•D.P., on behalf of minor child, D.V.P. v. Board of Education of the Borough of North Arlington, Bergen Co., Dr. Stephen Yurchak, Nicole Campbell Russo, Dennis Kenny, and Addison Keim, 8/1/2023, (#224-23)
D.P., on behalf of minor child, D.V.P. v. Board of Education of the Borough of North Arlington, Bergen Co., Dr. Stephen Yurchak, Nicole Campbell Russo, Dennis Kenny, and Addison Keim, 8/1/2023, (#224-23)
224-23Njcommned
Testo completo
OAL Dkt. No. EDU 03426-23 Agency Dkt. No. 110-4/23 New Jersey Commissioner of Education Order on Emergent Relief D.P., on behalf of minor child, D.V.P., Petitioner, v. Board of Education of the Borough of North Arlington, Bergen County, Respondent. The record of this matter and the Initial Decision of the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) have been reviewed and considered. The parties did not file exceptions. Upon review, the Commissioner concurs with the Administrative Law Judge that this matter should be dismissed because the parties have agreed that no issues remain to be addressed following the resolution of petitioner’s motion for emergent relief. Accordingly, the Initial Decision is adopted as the final decision in this matter, and the petition of appeal is hereby dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED.1 ACTING COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION Date of Decision: Date of Mailing: 1 This decision may be appealed to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:6-9.1. Under N.J.Ct.R. 2:4-1(b), a notice of appeal must be filed with the Appellate Division within 45 days from the date of mailing of this decision. 224-23 August 1, 2023 August 1, 2023
State of New Jersey OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW INITIAL DECISION OAL DKT. NO. EDU 03426-23 AGENCY DKT. NO. 110-4/23 D.P. ON BEHALF OF MINOR CHILD, D.V.P., Petitioner, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF NORTH ARLINGTON, BERGEN COUNTY Respondent. ______________________________________ Stephen J. Edelstein, Esq., for petitioner (Weiner Law Group, LLP, attorneys) Eric Harrison, Esq., for respondent (Methfessel & Werbel, PC, attorneys) Record Closed: June 30, 2023 Decided: July 5, 2023 BEFORE WILLIAM J. COURTNEY, ALJ: STATEMENT OF THE CASE Petitioner, D.P., sought emergent temporary relief on behalf of her son D.V.P. compelling respondent to take all steps necessary to protect D.V.P. from harassment, intimidation, and bullying (“HIB”) including removing four of his classmates from all
OAL DKT. NO. EDU 03426-23 2 classes that D.V.P. attends for the remainder of the school year. Petitioner alleges that respondent violated The Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights Act, N.J.S.A. 18A:37-1 et seq., and Board Policy #5512 titled, “Harassment, Intimidation and Bullying” by failing to open an HIB Investigation or taking any other actions to protect D.V.P. from ongoing harassment, intimidation, and bullying. Petitioner claimed that there is a reasonable likelihood that D.V.P. would suffer immediate and irreparable harm if the requested Emergent Relief was not granted. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Petitioner filed a Verified Petition of Appeal on April 25, 2023 seeking Emergent Relief to protect her minor child, who is an eight-grade student within the North Arlington School District (“District”) from ongoing harassment, intimidation, and bullying. On April 28, 2023, respondent filed a Verified Answer along with opposition to the Motion for Emergent Relief and a Cross-Motion to Dismiss petitioner’s appeal, without prejudice. The request for Emergent Relief and Motion to Dismiss was transmitted to the Office of Administrative Law by the New Jersey Department of Education for consideration. The parties’ written submissions were considered followed by oral argument of counsel beginning on May 1, 2023 and continuing, at the request of counsel, on May 8, 2023. The record was closed on May 8, 2023 after the oral arguments were presented. On May 23, 2023 an Order was entered denying petitioner’s claim for Emergent Relief and the parties have agreed that no other issues remain now that petitioner’s request for emergent relief has been resolved. LEGAL ANALYISIS The only issues before this tribunal in this matter were petitioner’s Motion for Emergent Relief and respondent’s Cross Motions relating to it. I FIND, and the parties agree, that the May 23, 2023 Order Denying Petitioner’s Motion and respondents Cross- Motions (See Exhibit A) resolve all issues and I CONCLUDE that this matter should be dismissed.
OAL DKT. NO. EDU 03426-23 3 ORDER IT IS on this 5th day of July, 2023 ORDERED that this matter be DISMISSED. July 5, 2023 ___ DATE WILLIAM COURTNEY, ALJ Date Received at Agency July 5, 2023________________________ Date Mailed to Parties: July 5, 2023 _ sej
OAL DKT. NO. EDU 03426-23 4 APPENDIX EXHIBITS: For Petitioners: P-1 Verified Petition of Appeal For Respondent: R-1 Verified Answer, Opposition to Motion for Emergent Relief and Cross-Motion to Dismiss
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.