Hay v. Spillar's Executors

Iluf

Judge..

The. question proposed is proper; a reversion, like this may lie passed by parol without deed.

Thu question was asked and the jury found for the plaintiffs. •A question was made upon the effect of the first deed, whether it conveyed the absolute property or only for life; hut the Judge gave no opinion upon-that point: he directed the raw to coneA der whether the parol evidence satisfied them that Spillar meant

by

consenting to Tutoi-s deed to pass his Interest, if any he hado

S¡>nere de

hoc,.