Kehano, Sr. v. Harrington

CourtListener 4873210Hawapp13 apr 2021

Testo completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed
Intermediate Court of Appeals
CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
13-APR-2021
09:32 AM
Dkt. 46 ODSLJ
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

ROLAND I. KEHANO, SR., Petitioner-Appellant, v.
SCOTT HARRINGTON, WARDEN, HALAWA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY;
FORMER TRIAL JUDGE SHACKLEY F. RAFFETTO; FORMER PROSECUTING
ATTORNEY RICHARD T. BISSEN, JR.; FORMER DEPUTY PROSECUTING
ATTORNEY DAVELYNN M. TENGAN; FORMER DEFENSE ATTORNEY
PAUL J. CUNNEY; CO-DEFENSE ATTORNEY ART E. ROSS, DECEASED;
MARY J. TIWANAK; CHAIRMAN ALBERT TUFONO; REAPPOINTED PAROLE,
PARDON, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, ADMINISTRATOR TOMMY JOHNSON,
Respondents-Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT
(S.P.P. NO. 19-1-0002(2) (CR. NO. 92-0562(2)))

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL
FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION
(By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth and Nakasone, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the April 6, 2021 Motion to
Dismiss Appeal for Lack of Appellate Jurisdiction (Motion) by
Respondent-Appellee State of Hawai#i, the papers in support, and
the record, it appears we lack appellate jurisdiction over self-
represented Petitioner-Appellant Roland I. Kehano, Sr.'s appeal
from S.P.P. No. 19-1-0002.1 Under Hawaii Revised Statutes § 641-
11 (2016) and Hawai#i Rules of Penal Procedure (HRPP) Rule 40(h),
"appeals from proceedings for post-conviction relief may be made
from a judgment entered in the proceeding and must be taken in
accordance with Rule 4(b) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate
Procedure (HRAP)." Grattafiori v. State, 79 Hawai#i 10, 13, 897

1
It is unclear what ruling(s) Kehano appeals from.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

P.2d 937, 940 (1995) (internal quotation marks and brackets
omitted).
An order is appealable and final only if it meets the
test of finality applicable to all judicial decisions. Familian
Nw., Inc. v. Cent. Pac. Boiler & Piping, Ltd., 68 Haw. 368, 369,
714 P.2d 936, 937 (1986).
"Final order" means an order ending the proceedings, leaving
nothing further to be accomplished. Consequently, an order
is not final if the rights of a party involved remain
undetermined or if the matter is retained for further
action.

Id. (internal block quotation format and citations omitted).
Here, the circuit court has not issued an order resolving any of
the grounds raised in Kehano's HRPP Rule 40 petition for post-
conviction relief.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is
granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are
dismissed as moot.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 13, 2021.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka
Presiding Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth
Associate Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone
Associate Judge

2

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.