Lupton v. Kardash

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed
Intermediate Court of Appeals
CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
27-APR-2026
08:17 AM
Dkt. 112 ODMR

NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

RAYLANI F. LUPTON, Petitioner-Appellee, v.
KEITH D. KARDASH, Respondent-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
HONOLULU DIVISION
(CASE NO. 1DSS-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
(By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, and Wadsworth and Guidry, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Respondent-Appellant's Motion to
Vacate Summary Disposition Order Dated April 9, 2026 for Being
Premature; Motion to Strike Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law
and Opening, Reply and Answering Briefs; Motion to Consolidate
this Case with Psak v. Kardash, CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX, Psak v. Kardash,
CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX, and Kardash v. Psak, CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX to Show the
Full Scope of the Judicial Bias, Corruption and Incompetence at
Play Here, filed on April 17, 2026, by self-represented
Respondent-Appellant Keith D. Kardash (Kardash), which this court
construes as a motion for consolidation and for reconsideration
under Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40, and the
records in this appeal and in appellate case numbers CAAP-26-
0000316, CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX, and CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX, it appears that
Kardash fails to demonstrate a point of law or fact that this
court overlooked or misapprehended in the April 9, 2026 Summary
Disposition Order.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is
denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 27, 2026.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka
Presiding Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth
Associate Judge

/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry
Associate Judge

2