Blackshear, Julian v. Doe, John et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
JULIAN R. BLACKSHEAR,
Plaintiff,
v.
CO SMITH,
Defendant.
ORDER
25-cv-388-jdp
Plaintiff Julian R. Blackshear, while incarcerated at Columbia Correctional Institution,
brought a complaint alleging that CCI officials disregarded the risk that he would cut himself.
Dkt. 1. I allowed Blackshear to proceed on an Eighth Amendment claim based on conscious
disregard of safety against defendant CO Smith in his individual capacity. Dkt. 15.
Smith answered, and the court scheduled a telephonic pretrial conference for December
2, 2025, at 3:30 p.m. Two weeks after Smith answered, Blackshear was released from prison
on extended supervision.
Neither party appeared at the December 2 telephonic pretrial conference. Dkt. 22. The
court ordered the parties to show cause in writing why they failed to appear at the conference
by December 8, 2025. Id. The court cautioned Blackshear that his failure to comply with its
order could result in dismissal. Id. Counsel for Smith responded to the court’s order, Dkt. 23,
and the court accepted counsel’s explanation for his failure to appear. Dkt. 24.
But Blackshear did not respond to the court’s order. Neither the court’s notice
scheduling the telephonic pretrial conference nor its order to respond was returned as
undeliverable. Blackshear was not incarcerated when the court sent him the order to respond,
so the court had to receive his response by December 8 for it to be timely. See Stevenson v. Elite
Case: 3:25-cv-00388-jdp Document #: 25 Filed: 01/26/26 Page 1 of 2

2
Staffing, Inc., No. 21-cv-1072, 2022 WL 17811587, at *1 (E.D. Wis. Dec. 19, 2022) (stating
that the prison mailbox rule does not apply to litigants who are not incarcerated even if they
are proceeding without counsel). I will dismiss the case without prejudice for failure to comply
with a court order and failure to prosecute.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. 	This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order
and failure to prosecute.
2. 	The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment and close the case.
Entered January 23, 2026.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
________________________________________
JAMES D. PETERSON
District Judge
Case: 3:25-cv-00388-jdp Document #: 25 Filed: 01/26/26 Page 2 of 2