3:18-cv-00337•Prust, Mikaela v. Bisignano, Frank
Testo completo
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MIKAELA PRUST, Plaintiff, v. FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER 18-cv-337-wmc On October 5, 2018, the court issued an order reversing and remanding this case to the commissioner for further proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Now before the court is plaintiff Mikaela Prust’s attorney’s petition for fees pursuant to § 406(b) in the gross amount of $6,208.19. (Dkt. #16.) As part of its judgment, a court may allow “a reasonable fee . . . not in excess of 25 percent of the . . . past-due benefits” awarded to the claimant. § 406(b)(1)(A). The fee is payable “out of, and not in addition to, the amount of [the] past-due benefits.” Id. Counsel asks the court to approve an attorney fee award in the net amount of $1,723.98, which represents the difference between the prior Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) fee award of $4,484.21 (see dkt. #15), and 25% of the past-due benefits and auxiliary benefits awarded to plaintiff, totaling $6,208.19. Defendant does not take a position on the reasonableness of the requested fee or on counsel’s request that counsel retain the EAJA award and receive the net award from past-due benefits. (Dkt. #19.) Having considered the supporting materials filed by plaintiff’s attorney, and hearing no objection from plaintiff or defendant, the court will grant the motion. The $6,208.19 in total fees requested by counsel are reasonable in light of the time he and members of his firm spent Case: 3:18-cv-00337-wmc Document #: 20 Filed: 02/02/26 Page 1 of 2
2 on this case and the favorable result he obtained for plaintiff while working on a contingency basis. Of course, counsel is not allowed to recover both awards. Section 406(b) has been harmonized with the EAJA; therefore, even though fee awards may be made under both the EAJA and § 406(b), a claimant’s attorney must refund to the claimant the amount of the smaller fee. Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796 (2002) (“[A]n EAJA award offsets an award under Section 406(b).”). In accordance with the court’s past practice, however, the court will allow counsel to retain the EAJA award, and the court will subtract the EAJA award from the amount awarded in this order. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that: 1) Counsel’s motion for attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) (dkt. #16) is GRANTED. 2) The court approves representative fees under § 406(b) in the gross amount of $6,208.19. 3) Counsel may retain the $4,484.21 previously awarded in EAJA fees in partial satisfaction of the § 406(b) award. 4) The net amount of $1,723.98 shall be disbursed by the Commissioner from any of plaintiff’s past-due benefits being withheld and in accordance with agency policy. Entered this 2nd day of February, 2026. BY THE COURT: /s/ ____________________________ WILLIAM M. CONLEY District Judge Case: 3:18-cv-00337-wmc Document #: 20 Filed: 02/02/26 Page 2 of 2
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.