USA v. Dominguez

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 3:25-cr-02315-LS Document 28 Filed 12/17/25 Ee 7 1.0f 4

[LED

DEC 17 2095
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (-,

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WESTERN 5) STIS COURT
EL PASO DIVISION fg oF eas
LERK
USA
v. NO: EP:25-CR-02315(1)-LS

(1) RICARDO GUADALUPE
DOMINGUEZ

also known as (a.k.a.) 'Mago", "Magos",
and "Magus"

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
UPON DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY

On this 17th day of December, 2025, the Defendant and counsel appeared before the
Court. After being admonished as required by Rule 11, Fed.R.Crim.P., the Defendant pled
guilty to Count One of the Indictment charging him with Conspiracy to Bring in Aliens, in
violation of Title 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(D, (a). )(A)(), and (a)(1)(B)(G), pursuant to a
Plea Agreement.
Accordingly, the Court makes the following findings:
1; The Defendant has consented to the entry of a guilty plea before a Magistrate
Judge, subject to final approval and sentencing by the presiding United States

District Judge.

No

The Defendant fully understands the oath and the consequences of failing to tell
the truth at the plea hearing.

The Defendant fully understands the right to plead “not guilty” and to be tried by a

o>)

jury.

4, The Defendant fully understands the right to be represented by counsel at trial and

AUTHENTICATED
U.S. GOVERNMENT
INFORMATION

GPO

Case 3:25-cr-02315-LS Document 28 Filed 12/17/25 Page 2of4

at every other stage of the proceeding.

The Defendant fully understands the right to a trial and that if the Defendant were
to elect to go to trial, the Defendant would have the right to confront and
cross-examine adverse witnesses, to be protected from compelled
self-incrimination, to testify and present evidence, and to compel the attendance of
witnesses.

The Defendant fully understands that if the guilty plea is accepted, there will not
be a trial in this case.

The Defendant fully understands the nature of the charge, the immigration
consequences, and the maximum possible penalties, including any imprisonment,
applicable mandatory minimum penalties, fine, term of supervised release, as well
as any forfeiture or restitution. The defendant also understands the court’s
obligation to impose a special assessment.

The Defendant fully understands that in determining sentence, the sentencing
court will consider the applicable Sentencing Guidelines, including any departures
that might be applicable, as well as the sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C. §
3553(a). The Defendant also fully understands that although the sentencing court
will consider the applicable sentencing guidelines, they are advisory in nature.

The Defendant fully understands the terms of the Plea Agreement. The Defendant
also fully understands that in the Plea Agreement, the Defendant has waived the
right to appeal or collaterally attack the conviction or sentence to be imposed by

the District Judge. The Defendant also understands that, if the court does not

Case 3:25-cr-02315-LS Document 28 Filed 12/17/25 Page 3of4

10.

Li

follow or apply any recommended or requested sentencing adjustments contained
in the Plea Agreement, the Defendant will have no right to withdraw the plea of
guilty.

The Defendant’s plea was not induced by any promises, other than those set forth
in the Plea Agreement, and the Defendant’s plea was not induced by any threats,
force or threats of force.

The Defendant acknowledged that defense counsel explained the immigration
consequences of the plea of guilty.

The Defendant is competent to enter a plea.

The Defendant’s plea is made freely, knowingly, and voluntarily.

There is a factual basis to support the plea of guilty.

In open court, the Government agreed that the $5,000 Special Assessment under
18 U.S.C. 3014 is no longer in effect and orally moved to remove it from the
Penalty chart in the Plea Agreement. The Defendant was unopposed.

RECOMMENDATION

Based on the foregoing, it is recommended to the district judge that the Defendant’s plea

of guilty be accepted and that a judgment of guilt be entered.

SIGNED and ENTERED this 17th day of December, 2025.

ANNE T. BERTON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:25-cr-02315-LS Document 28 Filed 12/17/25 Page 4of4

NOTICE

FAILURE TO FILE WRITTEN OBJECTIONS TO THE FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION CONTAINED IN THE FOREGOING REPORT, PRIOR TO
SENTENCING, MAY BAR DE NOVO DETERMINATION BY THE DISTRICT JUDGE
OF AN ISSUE COVERED HEREIN AND SHALL BAR APPELLATE REVIEW OF
SUCH FACTUAL FINDINGS AS MAY BE ACCEPTED OR ADOPTED BY THE
DISTRICT JUDGE.