Jallah v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration Case remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
FREDRICK J., 	§
Plaintiff, 	§
§
v. 	§ 	CIVIL A CTION N O. 4:25-cv-04883
§
COMMISSIONER OF 	SOCIAL 	SECURITY 	§
ADMINISTRATION, 	§
Defendant. 	§
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Remand.1 	ECF 17.
Plaintiff filed his complaint on October 14, 2025. ECF 1. The Commissioner filed
the Certified Administrative Record on January 6, 2026. ECF 9. Plaintiff filed his
Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF 14. In response, the Commissioner filed the
Motion to Remand. ECF 17.
In his motion, the Commissioner asks the Court to reverse the Administrative
Law Judge’s decision and remand the case for further administrative proceedings
pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). ECF 17 at 2-3. See also
Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). Defendant represents that Plaintiff does
not oppose this Motion. ECF 17 at 4.
1 The District Judge referred this case to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), the Cost and Delay Reduction Plan under the Civil Justice Reform Act,
and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72. ECF 7.
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
July 02, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 4:25-cv-04883 Document 18 Filed 07/02/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2

2
For the reasons stated above, the Court RECOMMENDS that Defendant’s
Motion (ECF 17) be GRANTED and the final administrative decision in this case
be REVERSED AND REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings
pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
The 	Clerk 	of 	the 	Court 	shall 	send 	copies 	of 	the 	memorandum 	and
recommendation to the respective parties, who will then have fourteen days to file
written objections, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). 	Failure to file written
objections within the time period provided will bar an aggrieved party from attacking
the factual findings and legal conclusions on appeal. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto.
Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded by statute on
other grounds.
Christina A. Bryan
United States Magistrate Judge
Signed on July 02, 2026, at Houston, Texas.
Case 4:25-cv-04883 Document 18 Filed 07/02/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2