4:25-cv-03819•Carter v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company et al
Carter v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company et al
4:25-cv-03819Txsd7 lug 2026
Testo completo
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION TIFFANY MICHELLE CARTER, Plaintiff. VS. ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:25-CV-3819 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On November 4, 2025, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Peter Bray for all pretrial purposes. (Dkt. 18). Judge Bray filed a Memorandum and Recommendation on May 15, 2026 recommending that: (1) Plaintiff’s motion to remand be denied; (2) Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Mariah Newsome (“Newsome”) be dismissed without prejudice on the basis that Newsome was improperly joined; and (3) Newsome’s two motions to dismiss be denied as moot. (Dkt. 37). No objections have been filed to the Memorandum and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Memorandum and Recommendation for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED July 07, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 4:25-cv-03819 Document 39 Filed 07/07/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
2 (1) Judge Bray’s Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 37) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; (2) Plaintiff’s motion to remand (Dkt. 15) is DENIED; (3) Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Mariah Newsome are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE on the basis that Newsome was improperly joined; and (4) Newsome’s motions to dismiss (Dkt. 13; Dkt. 30) are DENIED AS MOOT. It is so ORDERED. SIGNED at Houston, Texas on July 7, 2026. __________________________ GEORGE C. HANKS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 4:25-cv-03819 Document 39 Filed 07/07/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.