Moore v. City of Houston et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
TANISHA MOORE and DESTINY CEASAR, 	§
§
Plaintiffs, 	§
vs. 	§
§
CITY OF HOUSTON, et al., 	§
§
Defendants. 	§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23-cv-3048
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
Pending before the Court in the above-referenced proceeding are Defendant Officers
Cameron Overstreet, Jaime Vargas, Jesse Seay, Daryl Hudeck; Sean McCreary, Erik Holland,
Brandon Hollis, Tony Villa, Charles Dexter, Marco Lopez (collectively, "Defendant Officers"),
and the City of Houston's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 68), and Magistrate Judge
Bennett's Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. No. 72) that the Court grant Defendants'
Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties did not file objections to the Memorandum and
Recommendation, and the time to do so has since passed.
Upon review, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Bennett's conclusions. Accordingly,
it is hereby 	ORDERED 	that the 	Memorandum 	and Recommendation 	(Doc. 	No. 	72) 	is
ADOPTED. It is further ORDERED as follows:
• 	Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 68) is GRANTED.
• 	Plaintiffs' Fourth Amendment excessive force claim against Defendant Cameron
Overstreet is DISMISSED with prejudice.
• 	Plaintiffs' § 1983 wrongful death claim against Defendant Cameron Overstreet is
DISMISSED with prejudice.
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
June 03, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 4:23-cv-03048 Document 74 Filed 06/03/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2

• 	Plaintiffs' claims against the unidentified John Doe defendant(s) are DISMISSED
with prejudice.
As such, all remaining claims in this action have been resolved, and this case 1s
DISMISSED with prejudice.
Final judgment will enter separately.
,cl
Signed on this the 	3 	day of June, 2026.
Andrew S. Hanen
United States District Judge
2
Case 4:23-cv-03048 Document 74 Filed 06/03/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2