Saunders v. Collier et al

1 / 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
JEREMY SAUNDERS,
Plaintiff,
VS.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00250
BRYAN COLLIER, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
On November 13, 2025, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his
“Memorandum and Recommendation” (D.E. 56), recommending that this case be
dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and opportunity
to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely
filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error
on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing
Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 56), and all other relevant
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
December 04, 2025
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 2:24-cv-00250 Document 57 Filed on 12/04/25 in TXSD Page 1 of 2

2 / 2
documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
ORDERED on December 4, 2025.
_______________________________
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:24-cv-00250 Document 57 Filed on 12/04/25 in TXSD Page 2 of 2