Campos et al v. Shepherd et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
TYRA CAMPOS, et al. , 	§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Plaintiffs,
V. 	CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00040
WILLIAM SHEPHERD, et al. ,
Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION
Before 	the 	Court 	is 	Magistrate 	Judge 	Julie 	K. 	Hampton' s 	Memorandum 	and
Recommendation ("M&R"). (D .E. 50). The M&R recommends that the Court deny Plaintiffs'
motion to alter or amend the judgment. Id. at 4.
The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate
Judge' s M&R. S ee 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l); Fed. R. Ci v. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13 . No
objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only
determine whether the Magistrate Judge ' s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United
Stat es v. Wil son, 864 F.2d 12 19 , 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan
Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700, 2015 WL 3823141 , at * 1 (S.D. Tex. June 18 , 2015) (Harmon,
J.) (citation omitted).
Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings
of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous
or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in it s entirety. (D. E. 50). Accordingly, the Court
DENIES Plaintiffs motion to alter or amend the judgment, (D.E. 48).
SO ORDERED.
1 / 2
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
December 02, 2025
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 2:24-cv-00040 Document 51 Filed on 12/02/25 in TXSD Page 1 of 2

Signed: Corpus Chris~ Texas
December ;." , 2025
2 / 2
DA 	S. MORALES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:24-cv-00040 Document 51 Filed on 12/02/25 in TXSD Page 2 of 2