1:26-cv-00389•Rodriguez Lopez v. Warden, El Valle Detention Facility et al
Rodriguez Lopez v. Warden, El Valle Detention Facility et al
1:26-cv-00389Txsd6 lug 2026
Testo completo
1 / 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION DANIEL R. L., § “Petitioner,” § § v. § § Civil Action No. 1:26-cv-00389 WARDEN, EL VALLE DETENTION FACILITY, et al., “Respondents.” § § § ORDER Before the Court is Petitioner’s “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Dkt. No. 1), (“Petition”), Respondents’ “Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Summary Judgment” (Dkt. No. 9) (“MSJ”), Petitioner’s “Response in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment” (Dkt. No. 10) (“Reply”), the Magistrate Judge’s “Report and Recommendation to Deny Petitioner’s Habeas Petition” (Dkt. No. 11) (“R&R”), and “Petitioner’s Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation” (Dkt. No. 12) (“Objections”). The R&R recommends that the Court: (1) deny the Petition (Dkt. No. 1), (2) deny the MSJ (Dkt. No. 9) as moot, and (3) direct the Clerk of Court to close the case. Dkt. No. 11 at 1. When a party objects to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the Court reviews the matter de novo. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989). After such review, the Court hereby OVERRULES Petitioner’s Objections (Dkt. No. 12) and ADOPTS the R&R (Dkt. No. 11). Accordingly, the Petition (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED and the MSJ (Dkt. No. 9) is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of the Court is INSTRUCTED to close the case. United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED July 06, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 1:26-cv-00389 Document 13 Filed 07/06/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
2 / 2 SIGNED this July 6, 2026 Case 1:26-cv-00389 Document 13 Filed 07/06/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
Case 1:26-cv-00389 Document13 _ Filed 07/06/26 in TXSD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION DANIEL R. L., § “Petitioner,” § § Vv. § § WARDEN, EL VALLE DETENTION § FACILITY, et al., § “Respondents.” § ORDER Page 1 of 2 United States District Court Southem District of Texas ENTERED July 06, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Civil Action No. 1:26-cv-00389 Before the Court is Petitioner’s “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Dkt. No. 1), (‘“Petition’’), Respondents’ “Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Summary Judgment” (Dkt. No. 9) (“MSJ”), Petitioner’s “Response in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment” (Dkt. No. 10) (“Reply”), the Magistrate Judge’s “Report and Recommendation to Deny Petitioner’s Habeas Petition” (Dkt. No. 11) (“R&R”), and “Petitioner’s Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation” (Dkt. No. 12) (“Objections”’). The R&R recommends that the Court: (1) deny the Petition (Dkt. No. 1), (2) deny the MSJ (Dkt. No. 9) as moot, and (3) direct the Clerk of Court to close the case. Dkt. No. 11 at 1. When a party objects to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the Court reviews the matter de novo. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989). After such review, the Court hereby OVERRULES Petitioner’s Objections (Dkt. No. 12) and ADOPTS the R&R (Dkt. No. 11). Accordingly, the Petition (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED and the MSJ (Dkt. No. 9) is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of the Court is INSTRUCTED to close the case. 1/2 AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO 2/2 Case 1:26-cv-00389 Document 13 SIGNED this July 6, 2026 Filed 07/06/26 in TXSD__— Page 2 of 2 DE & LZ Rolando Olvéra / United States District Judge
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.