Richard-Flenory v. CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. - Hulen Mall Store et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
BEYLA Z RICHARD -F LENORY ,
Plaintiff,
v. 	No. 4:26-cv-00066-P
CARMAX A UTO SUPERSTORES, INC. -
H ULEN M ALL STORE, ET AL .,
Defendants.
ORDER
On January 21, 2026, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand to State
Court. ECF No. 6. The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings,
Conclusions, and a Recommendation regarding the Motion. ECF No. 22.
No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation
is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings,
Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the
undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions
of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the
Findings and Conclusions of the Court.
The Court therefore ORDERS that the Motion to Remand (ECF No.
6) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED on this 24th day of March 2026.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
REGINALEA KEMP ,
Plaintiff,
v. 	No. 4:23-cv-00841-P
REGIONS BANK ET AL .,
Defendants.
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File
Second Amended Complaint. ECF No. 18. Having considered the Motion
and applicable docket entries, the Court GRANTS the Motion.
SO ORDERED on this 18th day of September 2023.
______________________________________________
Mark T. Pittman
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 4:26-cv-00066-P-BJ Document 30 Filed 03/24/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID <pageID>